Twelve Angry Men

Twelve Angry Men

Student’s Name

Institution

Course

Instructor’s Name

Date

Twelve Angry Men

Twelve men who at first are outsiders to one another have the destiny of a young man resting in the palm of their hands. In the first place, everybody is persuaded he is liable except for one who has one sensible uncertainty in his psyche. The single man without anyone else could persuade every one of them by utilizing rationale to analyze the case. From the movies, we can see that the fate of the charged boy lies in the hands of people to decide whether guilty or not guilty. From a personal standpoint, it can be felt that some members of the jury have not assessed the situation and draw concrete information to dray judgement to the boy. 

The Foreman’s work is to keep the jury composed: He is an assistant football instructor outside the room. Jury 2 is a fearful bank representative who sets aside some effort to feel great enough to take an interest in the discussion. 4th Juror is a stock middle person. He wears glasses and seems to manage himself with a serious air.5th Juror works at a Harlem facility and expresses that he has lived in the ghettos his lifetime. This gives him learning into such nuances as the usage of a blade. (Rose, 2016)

6th An artist, he is happy that the case continues as it suggests, he doesn't have to work, yet is hesitant to put a conceivable killer back in the city. He sticks up for the ninth Juror, an old individual, and is a cognizant man.7th Juror's key worry for the state is whether it will be completed before his ball game, for which he has tickets. He offers jam and is normally indifferent concerning the case. He changes his vote to "not accountable" basically in light of the way that the tide of feeling switches, and he needs the contemplations to be done. (Rose, 2016) The 12th Juror works for an advancing office, to which work he suggests regularly. He seems, by all accounts, to be much of the time connected with the case.

Juror 3 is a person who's unbending in his feelings and not used to having individuals who can't help contradict him. Blameworthy and he detests the way that the preliminary gave such a great amount of time for the attorneys to make their contentions. All things considered, I guess you can't utter a word against it." (Rose, 2016)

jury 8 is emotional, just, caring, and shrewd. Being as it is, nothing would go anywhere with different attendants at an event he wasn't happy to put himself out there. He goes out on a limb all right off the bat in the film when he says, "I need to require a vote. I need you eleven men to cast a ballot by mystery vote.

Juror 10 is moderately aged, in his forties. He is unquestionably furious. He has negative suppositions concerning any individual who is not quite the same as he is. Throughout the story, he is regularly observed cleaning out his nose. (Rose, 2016) This probably won't be straightforwardly identified with his identity, but it could influence his understanding of whether he is well. 

Some of the jurors see the defendant as guilty and others are on the side of the defendant. The defendant might have done the crime not knowing he had done it. Could be driven by anger or be an act of a split second. The witnesses might be seen as they tend to save the kid from prosecution, and the juror might see some of the witness stories not adding up to the situation at hand. When the evidence is presented the juror gets convinced of the crime being committed towards the dad.

            To conclude, biases and prejudice could have adverse impacts on society and the group at large. The jury trying to come to a consensus saw Henry Fonda a nag before he spoke his mind out and little by little the members of the Jury joined one after another. Jack Klugman suffered a presumption by the fact that he was brought up in a slum by Lee J. Cobb. It was not until Joseph Sweeney confessed to changing the vote to not guilty after he felt that the discussion needed some review. From the heated arguments, every jury remains without using force drawing self-conscious decisions that there is room for debate on the matter hence they settled on the boy not guilty.

Reference

Rose, R. (2016). Twelve angry men. Bloomsbury Publishing.